Posted by Steven Hurdle on August 31, 2008
While much of the talk at Monday night’s Planning and Zoning meeting was about carriage houses, and the elephant in the room was the new gated communities on Bear Mountain, the topic discussed that garnered the most animated discussion of Westhills’ several proposals was their proposal to allow Westhills to create bachelor suites in their development.
Ryan McKenzie and Jim Hartshorne, there to represent the Westhills development to the committee, both agreed that they had no actual plans to create bachelor suites, but that they wanted to be able to should they see a golden opportunity to do so. At present they’re not allowed to as Langford’s secondary suite bylaw requires a suite to have a minimum of three rooms.
Committee member Norma Stewart noted that there appeared to be no definition, in the staff report on bachelor suites, of what a kitchen is. A kitchen “sometimes can be a sink and a hot plate, are there standards on what’s in a kitchen?”
Langford City Planner Matthew Baldwin answered that the bylaw only specifies that there must be Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment »
Posted by Steven Hurdle on August 30, 2008
Monday, City Hall is closed for the Labour Day holiday. Langford Council has an unusual Tuesday meeting instead of their normal Monday meeting, with an agenda that’s only 138 pages. It’s been many months since they’ve had an agenda that’s anywhere near that small, with recent agendas being routinely 200+, and the worst of them being 967 pages.
There are several development proposals on Tuesday’s agenda, several reports from staff and committees, and a presentation by the Greater Victoria Velodrome Association that is likely to either be anti-climactic, or more politically charged than ever before, due to Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments »
Posted by Steven Hurdle on August 29, 2008
Earlier today, an eight foot fence was erected around the velodrome, despite the track-cycling season still being in full-swing. West Shore Parks and Rec (WSPR) commissioned Aon Risk Control to assess whether the velodrome was dangerous or not, and concluded it was.
Interestingly, the bulk of the risks identified by the risk consultant are not new, and date back to the velodrome’s creation for the 1994 Commonwealth Games. Issues such as the moveable goal posts in the (previously closed) infield, and the lack of a barrier between the track and the turf, are reportedly among the alleged identified risks, features of the velodrome and its artificial turf infield since the facility opened.
The Juan de Fuca Velodrome is considered to be in good shape by those using it, who say Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in Uncategorized | 6 Comments »
Posted by Steven Hurdle on August 29, 2008
In a previous article, I talked a bit about Westhills seeking Leadership in Energey and Environmental Design Neighbourhood Development (LEED ND) certification. While LEED has traditionally been associated with high building standards, LEED ND is a new approach that rewards primarily how neighbourhoods are laid out. Westhills has agreed to live up LEED ND rules, but there are varying levels of certification and they are proposing a raft of changes to try to get a better score and, ultimately, a higher certification. The intention is to make higher levels of LEED certification a desirable thing for developers and consumers alike, so the financial implcations of Westhills receiving a good LEED rating might be significant to developments in the future.
Under LEED ND rules, less parking gets you more points towards a higher LEED rating. As a consequence of this, Westhills has asked for permission to offer less parking for the forthcoming phases of their development than Langford’s bylaws would normally allow, with some houses getting only one parking spot. Westhills representatives have indicated that they want to communicate to potential homebuyers up front that parking in Westhills will be less than it is elsewhere.
Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in Uncategorized | 11 Comments »
Posted by Steven Hurdle on August 28, 2008
Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments »
Posted by Steven Hurdle on August 27, 2008
Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment »
Posted by Steven Hurdle on August 26, 2008
Posted in Uncategorized | 3 Comments »
Posted by Steven Hurdle on August 25, 2008
Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment »
Posted by Steven Hurdle on August 24, 2008
Posted in Uncategorized | 7 Comments »
Posted by Steven Hurdle on August 23, 2008
There’s a request for a variance to create gates for four communities on Bear Mountain. The staff report on this issue, attached to the agenda for Monday night’s Planning and Zoning (P&Z) meeting is clearly conflicted on what to recommend to the committee. City Hall staff note that the new Official Community Plan recommends an open and welcoming community, on the one hand, but advocates for security on the other, and that gated communities are seen as working both for and against those overriding principles by advocates and detractors. Further complicating the issue is the fact that three of the four gated communities have actually already been built, and these variances are being requested after the fact in those cases. But the facts to consider don’t stop there.
City Hall staff note that the gates prevent access to public parkland Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in Uncategorized | 4 Comments »