Inside Langford

News and views about Langford, British Columbia

Mystery on Scafe Rd.

Posted by Steven Hurdle on September 10, 2008

Many of the residents of the North end of Scafe Road believe their street has been inundated with parking from recent multi-unit buildings on nearby streets. A resident near the south end of Scafe is not so sure. City Hall has some different ideas yet again. So what’s really going on?

The part of Scafe Road in question is roughly in the centre of the group of streets between Goldstream Ave, Veteran’s Memorial, the Transcanada Highway, and Jacklin Road. It’s a single-family dwelling neighbourhood, but has been flagged by City Hall for redevelopment to match the three and four-storey multi-unit buildings propping up on nearby streets like Deville, Brock, and Peatt.

Now, in the interests of full disclosure, I lived on Scafe Road for many years (it was the street my family moved to when we came to Langford when I was 16, back in the 1980s). That said, I moved to my current house in 1996 and the Scafe Road area has changed significantly since I lived there. The only thing I can state with a certainty is that these problems didn’t exist then. Those changes are what many of the current residents of Scafe Road feel are the source of the parking problem.

The issue first came up on August 12th at the Transportation and Public Works Committee meeting. Several Scafe Road residents had complained to City Hall that on-street parking had become horrific, with some houses having as many as six cars parked in front of them on the street. They argued that nothing on Scafe itself had changed, so the problem must be due to the influx of new residents in the existing multi-unit buildings, or construction workers working on new ones going up.

City Hall staff visited Scafe and looked at those possibilities. Langford’s chief Engineer said that staff had concluded that “it didn’t appear to be construction workers,” as the cars were still there after the end of the work day. As for it being residents of nearby multi-unit buildings, they noted that not all of the parking spots in the nearest new development were occupied.

A member of the committee noted, as it had been during the recent discussion of Revilo, that the area’s “garages are full of yachts and lawnmowers, there’s not a car in them.” Of course, that observation doesn’t suggest a solution as it’s not possible to legislate what people do with their garages.

The committee discussed the possibility of turning downtown greenspace into parking, and then reclaiming it as greenspace once traffic concerns die down when commuter rail becomes a reality. Langford’s engineer noted that “that’s a strategy,” but it was also quickly noted by another committee member that “once you lose greenspace you’ll never get it back.”

Some members of the committee argued that they believed that a lot of the houses on Scafe have suites. That may or may not be true, but the question is do they have more suites now than before since this is a very recent problem?

Denise Blackwell offered, as he has on other occasions when the topic of parking for multi-unit buildings comes up, that when she used to live in a condo where there were ten units and only 5 cars amongst them, two of them for her family. This anecdotal observation on her part is clearly not typical, however, given the feedback City Hall has been receiving from neighbourhoods on the issue of parking in areas where density has increased recently.

Transportation Committee members toyed with the idea at that August 12th meeting of doing permit-only parking for the entire area (not just Scafe) but Langford’s engineer recommended against that, noting that a “consultant concluded we don’t have a shortage of parking downtown.”

It was clear that as strongly as the residents felt it was the nearby condos, that there were many who felt equally strongly that it had nothing to do with the condos. Committee member, and local developer, Les Bjola said “One of my tenants has 6 cars,” and it was further noted that “we’ve got a major long-term problem.”

The question of how long until Scafe Road joined other neighbouring streets in getting redeveloped. Langford’s engineer responded to that by saying “we’ve got a vision,” for what the area will look like in the future. As to how long it would take for all of the area to get redeveloped? “My guess, a generation.”

In a future post Inside Langford will look at what Langford Council’s take on this issue was when it came before their August 18th meeting, as well as what a resident of Strathmore (near the south-end of Scafe) had to say about it. Unless a Nancy Drew or Hardy Boys novel, this story may not read through to a convenient, open-and-shut ending, given people don’t yet agree on what the source of the problem is, let alone what the solution might be.

Steven Hurdle -

Update: Here is that future post.

Advertisement

4 Responses to “Mystery on Scafe Rd.”

  1. Jack said

    Surely the administration can determine the address of the owners of all the cars parked on the residential street. Get the license numbers and have the RCMP check the ownership.

  2. Barb said

    The destruction of a neighbourhood is much like a falling deck of cards. It starts at one end, destroying the integrity of its strength, and as people become disheartened (or cave in to the offers of developers) they sell their family homes and another street becomes a developer’s dream. But this is the result of who was elected to determine the future of Langford – the present council is entirely driven by greed. Time to get rid of this cancer in the community.

  3. Jack said: “Surely the administration can determine the address of the owners of all the cars parked on the residential street. Get the license numbers and have the RCMP check the ownership.”

    I would expect you’re right, but that doesn’t seem to be the approach they’re choosing to take. When a resident recently stood up in Council Chambers and stated “I’ve got all the licence plate numbers,” (see article of the same name) there was no reaction. If they felt that was the approach they wanted to take, I would have expected them to say “Great, pass them on to Bylaw Enforcement staff and we’ll get to the bottom of this.” Instead, they encouraged the residents to band together and bring forward a petition demanding permit parking. You raise an interesting question, Jack. Why aren’t they doing what you suggest?

  4. ian phillips said

    The Mayor and council should put all their efforts into resolving this matter. Look at the personal time and effort the Mayor contributed towards the builking of the Spencer interchange.There is no reason why the people on Scafe Road should not receive the same determined support.
    The Mayor and Council repeatedly use phrases like “liveability and sustainability”Well here’s a prime opportunity for them to “walk the talk” and resolve this matter for these residents .
    I suggest we continue to monitor this matter to determine if this elected group cares about the needs of ordinary citizens like those on Scafe Road and are willing to act on behalf of the citizens who elected them to represent them

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

Gravatar
WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

 
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.