<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Money in the kitty?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://insidelangford.ca/2009/11/09/money-in-the-kitty/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://insidelangford.ca/2009/11/09/money-in-the-kitty/</link>
	<description>News and views about Langford, British Columbia</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 03:02:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam Snipes</title>
		<link>http://insidelangford.ca/2009/11/09/money-in-the-kitty/#comment-2567</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sam Snipes]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 06:50:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://insidelangford.ca/?p=2423#comment-2567</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a perfect world we would have built up a capital reserve to fund projects such as this but that well is dry. I find it hard to believe that the Feds and the Province went to all of the effort to fund this project and announce it as the largest in the region without any hint that Langford could actually fund its share.

If this is a project that the ratepayers decide they want to fund then I would prefer to see Langford borrow from the MFA or the Feds and do it properly. Although it sounds attractive having the leaseholder loan the money to the city, you have to wonder what sort of the deal the city is going to get. If I were the operator I would demand a huge premium. There is far too much uncertainly in any new venture to try and anticipate what the outcome might be 66 years down the road. Free rent for money up front might sound good in theory, but the taxpayer will still have to maintain the facility anfor the duration of the term.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a perfect world we would have built up a capital reserve to fund projects such as this but that well is dry. I find it hard to believe that the Feds and the Province went to all of the effort to fund this project and announce it as the largest in the region without any hint that Langford could actually fund its share.</p>
<p>If this is a project that the ratepayers decide they want to fund then I would prefer to see Langford borrow from the MFA or the Feds and do it properly. Although it sounds attractive having the leaseholder loan the money to the city, you have to wonder what sort of the deal the city is going to get. If I were the operator I would demand a huge premium. There is far too much uncertainly in any new venture to try and anticipate what the outcome might be 66 years down the road. Free rent for money up front might sound good in theory, but the taxpayer will still have to maintain the facility anfor the duration of the term.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven Hurdle</title>
		<link>http://insidelangford.ca/2009/11/09/money-in-the-kitty/#comment-2566</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Hurdle]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 03:52:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://insidelangford.ca/?p=2423#comment-2566</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In an informal conversation with Councillor Lanny Seaton after last night&#039;s PZ&amp;A meeting, I was told that while you do have to show that you have all zoning, regulatory, and environmental hurdles in place for a project to get funding from the federal government, that you in fact do not have to show that you have funding in advance.

He indicated that if a deal with the private sector cannot be reached that they will go to the electorate, either through a referendum or a counter petition, to secure the millions needed for Langford&#039;s share of the costs.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In an informal conversation with Councillor Lanny Seaton after last night&#8217;s PZ&amp;A meeting, I was told that while you do have to show that you have all zoning, regulatory, and environmental hurdles in place for a project to get funding from the federal government, that you in fact do not have to show that you have funding in advance.</p>
<p>He indicated that if a deal with the private sector cannot be reached that they will go to the electorate, either through a referendum or a counter petition, to secure the millions needed for Langford&#8217;s share of the costs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

