Inside Langford

News and views about Langford, British Columbia

Island Corridor Foundation needs regional districts to support E&N rail line plans

Posted by Steven Hurdle on November 1, 2012

Bernard Von Schulmann has posted an interesting analysis of the Island Corridor foundation’s situation as it tries to get the money together to get the E&N rail line repaired and trains moving again. In short, they have $7.5 million from the federal government, $7.5 million from the provincial government, and need a smaller amount from the five regional districts the line goes through.

Two of the five have so far agreed to levy the small amount on property taxes. And when I say small, I mean small: a couple of dollars per property per year for five years in Bernard’s analysis. His analysis appears to assume that it would be entirely paid by residents, but I’m not sure that’s accurate. Would business property tax rolls really be ignored in this? An argument could be made that they could benefit from commuter rail.

So far the Capital Regional District has not signed on. This is a challenge for the Island Corridor Foundation because the CRD represents slightly more than half of the population of the five regional districts in question. Langford Council has had their differences with the CRD in the past, but Langford is probably the single-most enthusiastically supportive municipality of getting commuter rail running on the E&N line, and a referendum on the subject garnered massive support from Langford voters a few municipal elections ago, so if the CRD agrees to pursue this they would likely not receive any local resistance.

About these ads

2 Responses to “Island Corridor Foundation needs regional districts to support E&N rail line plans”

  1. bentover said

    What call is there for a service from Victoria to Courtenay? Not much. What call is there for a service from Langford to Downtown? Lots. This small portion ought to be done first. To do it will be cheap, fast and will illustrate the benefits to the other areas that can join later on.

  2. jmw said

    Where are the feasibility studies which show this would be a long term viable option and would be supported by enough of the population to maintain and run it long-term? I am tired of costly “great ideas” (like bike lanes along Craigflower) which do little to solve traffic problems and in my mind are an irresponsible waste of tax-payer dollars to indulge some “faddish” bureaucrats. I am required to use my car for work (I am a community nurse) so alternate forms of transportation aren’t an option. When I tried to participate in the “public input” surveys, “are you required to use your car for work?” was not even an option/choice on the survey.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

 
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 32 other followers

%d bloggers like this: